How the engineering skills should consume this repo's domain documentation when exploring the codebase.
CONTEXT.md at the repo root.docs/adr/ — if it exists, read ADRs that touch the area you're about to work in.If any of these files don't exist, proceed silently. Don't flag their absence; don't suggest creating them upfront. Skill(domain-modeling) creates them lazily when terms or decisions actually get resolved.
This repo uses the single-context layout:
/
├── CONTEXT.md
├── docs/adr/
│ ├── 001-event-sourced-orders.md
│ └── 002-postgres-for-write-model.md
└── src/
When your output names a domain concept (in an issue title, a refactor proposal, a hypothesis, or a test name), use the term as defined in CONTEXT.md. Don't drift to synonyms the glossary explicitly avoids.
If the concept you need isn't in the glossary yet, that's a signal — either you're inventing language the project doesn't use (reconsider) or there's a real gap (note it for Skill(domain-modeling)).
If your output contradicts an existing ADR, surface it explicitly rather than silently overriding:
Contradicts ADR-0007 (event-sourced orders) — but worth reopening because…
Can you improve this documentation?Edit on GitHub
cljdoc builds & hosts documentation for Clojure/Script libraries
| Ctrl+k | Jump to recent docs |
| ← | Move to previous article |
| → | Move to next article |
| Ctrl+/ | Jump to the search field |