re-frame-10x
captures execution trace (data) and provides a UI for inspecting it. But, sometimes, you want more than this. Sometimes you want to interact with this datain your REPL.
This document explains how you can access trace data from within your REPL - so you can experiement with it.
I'm talking here about using a browser-connected REPL - the kind offered by shadow-clj or figwheel - where any code you enter into your REPL, is ultimately executed within the content of browser-VM currently running your app.
If you were to type the code (my-ns/some-fn "blah" 2)
into your REPL and hit return,
this browser-connected REPL process would proceed in three steps:
Further notes ...
The Step 1 compilation happens within the context of the REPL's current namespace)
but can use any part of your app's codebase, so long as it
has been previously required
. The code fragment above accesses some-fn
in the namespace my-ns
, so to make it work, something like the following would
previously have happened in your REPL:
(require '[my-ns])
or maybe
(require '[some-app.mine :as my-ns])
For Step 3, when the code is executing in the browser, it can access any part of your running app.
re-frame-10x
is effectively a part of your app.
Yes, it looks separate, but it is running alongside your app in the same browser VM and that means it can be accessed from the REPL like any other part of your app. But, of course, you have to know how to reach into re-frame-10x and obtain it.
To make this "reaching in" easy, re-frame-10x
supplies an API function called traced-result
in a namespace day8.re-frame-10x
, which you can call from the REPL like this:
(day8.re-frame-10x/traced-result 80 4)
Wait. Yes, it is a function call, but what are those arguments 80
and 4
? And how will I know what alternative arguments to supply for my case?
Well, as you'll soon see, it actually doesn't matter and you won't be suppling them yourself.
But, because your brain is curious and needs an answer, let's give it one, even if it doesn't matter, and I'm lying.
Those numbers are "trace coordinates" which identify the particular piece of trace data you want.
Imagine that 80
is the Epoch id
and 4
is the trace-id within that Epoch
. Happier? Moving on.
To facilitate REPL exploration of trace data:
re-frame-10x
will write (ClojureScript) code into the clipboard (when you click on certain hyperlinks in the re-frame-10x UI)Initially, you click on the repl requires hyperlink, and re-frame-10x
will
put into the clipboard the require
code needed to access the re-frame-10x
API.
You then paste this code into your REPL and execute it. That's the setup.
Then, later, in the re-frame-10x
UI you'll notice a small "repl"
hyperlink against each piece of trace you hover over. Again, if you click it, re-frame-10x
will put code into
the clipboard which uses its own API together with the "trace coordinates" for the data you want.
When you paste this clipboard code into the REPL, you are able to access to the exact
piece of trace data you want. What's in the clipboard will be something like (day8.re-frame-10x/traced-result 80 4)
but it actually doesn't matter what it is - re-frame just gives you an expression which
retrieve the traced data you want.
So, you might execute something this at the REPL:
(count (day8.re-frame-10x/traced-result 80 4))
And, just to be clear, that (day8.re-frame-10x/traced-result 80 4)
part would be what you pasted in
from the clipboard, and then wrapped it in a count
call.
Or maybe you'd use it like this:
(let [trace-data (day8.re-frame-10x/traced-result 80 4)]
(count trace-data))
Or:
(def tmp (day8.re-frame-10x/traced-result 80 4))
(count tmp)
So, how you use the expression in the clipboard is up to you.
Do you see now why the 80
and 4
are not meaningful or important to you. re-frame-10x
supplies the right expression (form), and you just use it. It is opaque.
This approach carefully avoids the often-problematic need to
serialise trace data held by re-frame-10x
in the browser and then
transfer it over the wire to the REPL for use.
First, when you are tracing large amounts of data, serialisation and then later de-serialisation will take too long, and you'd loose the advantages of structural sharing along the way.
Also, to serialise/de-serialise sometimes requires special extensions to be present for the reader literals, etc. All too complicated. Best avoided.
Can you improve this documentation? These fine people already did:
Mike Thompson, Daniel Compton, Gregg8 & Kimo KnowlesEdit on GitHub
cljdoc is a website building & hosting documentation for Clojure/Script libraries
× close