farolero masc. n.
Historical Spanish, meaning "lamplighter", e.g. "A lamplighter claimed to have seen Jack the Ripper on this street last night."
Error handling in Clojure is not yet a solved problem. Each method of handling errors commonly used comes with downsides. Representing error states with nil is convenient for code structure, but prevents detailed error information from being conveyed to the program outside of logs. The either monad requires special syntax to be convenient for use and offers no options for error recovery. Exceptions are the default way to handle errors in the JVM, but Clojure has no easy way to extend the exception mechanism with new types, limiting how much control you have over which errors you handle without re-throwing. Condition libraries like special give the programmer tools for reporting errors but limited options in recovery, or break in multithreaded contexts.
This library implements an improved version of these conditions, very close to the spec defined for Common Lisp's conditions and restarts. This method of handling errors follows the Clojure philosophy of decomplection by separating error handling into three parts: reporting, reconciliation, and recovery.
The library is available on Clojars. Just add the following to your deps.edn
file in the :deps
key.
{org.suskalo/farolero {:mvn/version "1.3.1"}}
If you use clj-kondo then you may also
want to import the configuration and hooks included with the library. This can
be done by running the following command, and then adding
"org.suskalo/farolero"
to the :config-paths
key in your kondo config, as the
command recommends.
$ clj-kondo --copy-configs --dependencies --lint "$(clojure -Spath)"
Imported config to .clj-kondo/org.suskalo/farolero. To activate, add "org.suskalo/farolero" to :config-paths in .clj-kondo/config.edn.
The 1.1.0 release was just released, and it represents a major milestone for farolero. It includes a full test suite for ClojureScript support, and brings the CLJS version of farolero almost up to feature parity with the CLJ version.
As of right now, the only thing that ClojureScript lacks significant support for
is the interactive debugger, because ClojureScript environments vary so much
from project to project. That said, you can still write your own custom
debuggers, but assert
and check-type
won't fully integrate with them at the
moment.
In this library there are three major components: conditions, handlers, and restarts. Each one represents one of the three parts error handling is split into when using this library. In places where an error might arise, you bind restarts, named sections of code which provide ways to recover from an error.
If you're an experienced Common Lisper, then most of this should be review, but you may wish to skim further ahead to the code examples to see the few places where the syntax differs.
Handlers are functions that are run when an error is encountered to decide how to recover from the situation.
(handler-case (signal ::signal)
(::signal [condition]
(println condition)
(println "Handled the signal!")
:result))
;; :user/signal
;; Handled the signal!
;; => :result
The macro handler-case
executes the expression it's passed in a context where
the handlers below are called when a condition is signaled. In general,
handler-case
is used when you can replace the entire expression wholesale with
the result from the handler. When a condition with a handler is signaled,
control flow is immediately passed out of the expression and to the handler.
(handler-case (do (signal ::signal)
(println "Never reached"))
(::signal [condition]
(println "Handled the signal!")
:result))
;; Handled the signal!
;; => :result
This construct acts very similarly to Java's throw
and catch
. However,
additional arguments beyond the condition can be passed to the handler.
(handler-case (signal ::signal "world" :other-argument)
(::signal [condition s v]
(println "Hello," s)
(prn v)))
;; Hello, world
;; :other-argument
;; => nil
This works through the entire dynamic scope of the expression passed, so the signal may be made arbitrarily deep in the stack.
(defn f
[]
(signal ::signal :result))
(defn g
[]
(f))
(handler-case (g)
(::signal [condition res]
res))
;; => :result
If a condition is signaled and there's no handler bound, then signal
will
return nil.
(signal ::signal)
;; => nil
Conditions are the values that get signaled. Namespaced keywords are used for the default signals, but they aren't the only values which can be used. Any object except for an un-namespaced keyword may be used as a signal.
(handler-case (signal (RuntimeException. "An exception"))
(Exception [ex]
(println (.getMessage ex))
:result))
;; An exception
;; => :result
This example also shows that handlers are applied with regard for inheritance. This inheritance is both through Java's inheritance hierarchy, and also by Clojure's default hierarchy.
(handler-case (signal :farolero.core/simple-condition)
(:farolero.core/condition [condition]
:result))
;; => :result
When you call signal
with any value, farolero will ensure that it derives from
:farolero.core/condition
, at least indirectly. If the value derives from
:farolero.core/condition
indirectly, then nothing changes.
(contains? (ancestors ::random-condition) :farolero.core/condition)
;; => false
(handler-case (signal ::random-condition)
(:farolero.core/condition [condition]
:result))
;; => :result
(contains? (ancestors ::random-condition) :farolero.core/condition)
;; => true
There are multiple ways to signal conditions with farolero. The way to signal
conditions we've used so far is signal
. In addition there are warn
, error
,
and cerror
(we'll talk about cerror
when we discuss restarts).
(handler-case (error ::random-error)
(:farolero.core/error [condition]
:result))
Conditions used for warn
are made to derive :farolero.core/warning
, and for
error
and cerror
the conditions derive :farolero.core/error
. All Java
classes that extend from Exception also derive :farolero.core/error
, and the
same for js/Error in ClojureScript.
When you know the return value to be used as a replacement for the whole
expression, handler-case
is the way to bind a handler. However, in some cases
you may not want to abort execution of the expression in order to handle the
condition. In these cases, handler-bind
is more appropriate.
(handler-bind [::signal (fn [condition]
(println "In the condition handler."))]
(signal ::signal))
;; In the condition handler.
;; => nil
If a handler bound in this way returns normally (rather than via e.g. throw
),
then signal
(and the other condition signaling functions) will keep searching
for another handler which applies.
(handler-bind [:farolero.core/condition (fn [condition]
(println "In outer handler"))]
(handler-bind [::signal (fn [condition]
(println "In inner handler"))]
(signal ::signal)))
;; In inner handler
;; In outer handler
;; => nil
If calling warn
and all the handlers return normally, or no handler is found,
then the condition is printed to *err*
.
(warn "something went weird")
;; WARNING: :farolero.core/simple-warning signaled with arguments "something went weird"
;; => nil
Handlers give you a method of reacting to conditions when they are signaled.
Restarts provide a method of resuming the computation based on what environment
it's executing in. The macro restart-case
mirrors handler-case
, but with
invoke-restart
taking the place of signal
.
(restart-case (invoke-restart ::restart)
(::restart []
(println "Invoked the restart!")
:result))
;; Invoked the restart!
;; => :result
Unlike handlers, there is no inheritance between different restarts. Jumping to a particular restart must be done by exact name, and only keywords can be used as restart names.
Just like handler-case
, invoking a restart in restart-case
immediately
unwinds to outside of the expression and invokes the restart.
(restart-case (do (invoke-restart ::restart)
(println "Never reached"))
(::restart []
(println "Invoked the restart!")
:result))
;; Invoked the restart!
;; => :result
The warn
and cerror
functions each bind a restart that can be used by
handlers for the condition which gets signaled. The warn
function binds
:farolero.core/muffle-warning
(which can be called by the muffle-warning
function) which prevents the warning from being printed and continues execution
of the program.
(handler-bind [::warning (fn [condition]
(muffle-warning))]
(warn ::warning))
;; => nil
The cerror
function binds a :farolero.core/continue
restart (which can be
called by the continue
function) which continues as if the error never
happened. The first argument to cerror
is text that describes what ignoring
the error will do, and is used for interactive debugging.
(handler-bind [::error (fn [condition]
(continue))]
(cerror "Ignore the error" ::error))
;; => nil
When binding restarts, a test function can be provided that will be called to test if the restart should be visible at any given time. This function must take optional rest arguments for a condition the restart is being searched for in the context of and its arguments.
(restart-case (find-restart ::some-restart)
(::some-restart [] :test (constantly nil)
(println "Impossible to reach")))
;; => nil
As demonstrated above, find-restart
may be called to find the first applicable
restart with a given name. You can call invoke-restart
directly with its
return value instead of with the restart name to prevent the need to look it up
again.
The function compute-restarts
returns a list of visible restarts, each value
of which includes a :farolero.core/restart-name
key containing the restart's
name.
One restart is always bound, named :farolero.core/throw
. It immediately throws
the condition using ex-info
.
A dual to restart-case
and mirror to handler-bind
is restart-bind
. It has
the same syntax as handler-bind, and when a restart is invoked, it is invoked as
a normal function and does not unwind the stack. This is generally not
particularly useful as if non-local transfer of control does not occur in the
restart, it will return to the code calling it, likely meaning that further
handlers will be invoked. The primary use of this macro is in the implementation
of additional facilities built atop restarts, such as restart-case
.
When error
or cerror
is called and no handler is bound for the condition
being signaled, the debugger is invoked using the function invoke-debugger
.
(restart-case (error ::ayy)
(::some-restart [])
(::some-other-restart []))
;; => throws an ex-info "Unhandled condition"
By default, the debugger will just throw the condition (wrapping it if it's not already an exception). This enables library developers to use conditions without requiring their users to learn farolero. For code that wants to use an interactive debugger however, the following line should be included.
(alter-var-root #'farolero.core/*debugger-hook* (constantly nil))
This will deactivate the debugger that throws exceptions, and allow farolero to
use the "system debugger" that is built in. This can, for example, be done
either at the top level or at runtime for an application, or in a namespace
loaded only during development (like user
) for a library.
(restart-case (error ::ayy)
(::some-restart [])
(::some-other-restart []))
;; Debugger level 1 entered on :user/ayy
;; :user/ayy was signaled with arguments nil
;; 0 [:user/some-restart] :user/some-restart
;; 1 [:user/some-other-restart] :user/some-other-restart
;; 2 [:farolero.core/throw] Throw the condition as an exception
;; user> 0
;; => nil
When the system debugger is invoked, it reports the condition which triggered it, and lists the restarts available in the current context. If you enter a simple number that's an index of one of the available restarts, then that restart will be invoked interactively, prompting the user for input. If the restart has no special handling for being invoked interactively, as the restarts above, a default interactive handler will be used.
Instead of using a number, arbitrary expressions may be evaluated at the debugger before providing a restart to continue with. This may be used to get the program into a state where the error may be continued from without issues.
If any more unhandled errors arise during the debugger's evaluation, then an additional recursive layer of the debugger is invoked.
(error ::ayy)
;; Debugger level 1 entered on :user/ayy
;; :user/ayy was signaled with arguments nil
;; 0 [:farolero.core/throw] Throw the condition as an exception
;; user> (error "oy")
;; Debugger level 2 entered on :farolero.core/simple-error
;; oy
;; 0 [:farolero.core/abort] Return to level 1 of the debugger
;; 1 [:farolero.core/throw] Throw the condition as an exception
;; user>
When inside recursive layers of the debugger, the :farolero.core/abort
restart
is bound, allowing you to return to higher levels of the debugger and work from
there.
The debugger and interactive restarts use *in*
and *out*
for input and
output, but many interactive restarts also signal conditions to request the data
they need and allow it to be supplied by using a :farolero.core/use-value
restart.
In some contexts, it may be desirable to have alternative behavior when
conditions are raised without an applicable handler, rather than invoking the
default interactive debugger (e.g. writing a custom GUI debugger). The dynamic
variable *debugger-hook*
can be bound to change the behavior of
invoke-debugger
. The default value for the hook is throwing-debugger
, which
is a function that will throw any conditions it is invoked with.
When making custom debuggers, the user binds a function to the hook. The bound
function must take two arguments, first a list of the condition and its
arguments, and the second is the currently bound debugger hook, which should be
used to invoke the debugger again rather than calling invoke-debugger
directly, or to bind *debugger-hook*
again before calling other code, as
invoke-debugger
unbinds the hook before calling it, so that if an error is
raised in it the system debugger will be invoked instead.
If the *debugger-hook*
is bound to nil, it will invoke the system debugger,
which by default is the debugger described above. The *system-debugger*
dynamic variable contains the debugger to be called in this situation. This
variable should never be bound to nil.
The break
function can be used to create breakpoints in your code. When
called, it binds *debugger-hook*
to nil before calling invoke-debugger
,
ensuring the system debugger is used. This allows the primary debugger to be one
which automatically handles errors, such as throwing-debugger
, but when
break
is called, the system debugger will be invoked, allowing the user to
interactively debug the application before resuming execution.
When binding restarts, additional information can be provided for use with the debugger. A report function can be provided, as well as a function invoked to interactively request any needed arguments to the restart function.
(restart-case (error ::ayy)
(::some-restart [x]
:report (fn [restart] (str "Value for some restart"))
:interactive (constantly (list 5))
x))
;; Debugger level 1 entered on :user/ayy
;; :user/ayy was signaled with arguments nil
;; 0 [:user/some-restart] Value for some restart
;; 1 [:farolero.core/throw] Throw the condition as an exception
;; user> 0
;; => 5
With an understanding of what conditions and restarts are, and how to use them, there remains the question of when they should be applied.
The basic rule of thumb is any time there's more than one way to handle a situation, you bind some restarts and signal a condition. For a more concrete look at the kinds of situations this may occur in, and how this can improve your code, take a look at the example projects.
When writing libraries with farolero, it may be desirable to not require the user to have experience with farolero, instead allowing them to use more familiar methods of error handling.
In these cases, farolero's default debugger will aid the library developer. When an error is signaled and not handled, the debugger is invoked. In general, the user will be the one who decides which debugger will be used, but if they don't use farolero directly, it will be left as the default, which will throw the condition as an exception.
In order to aid in exception handling in your public api, errors should be signaled as exceptions with no additional arguments.
(error (RuntimeException. "an error"))
;; => throws a RuntimeException
If any additional arguments are signaled along with the condition, or if
something other than an exception is signaled, then the value will be wrapped in
an ex-info
.
(error (RuntimeException. "an error") ::some-arg)
;; => throws an ex-info with a RuntimeException cause
(error ::some-condition)
;; => throws an ex-info
The ex-info
will have the keys :condition
, containing the signaled value,
and :args
containing a seq of the rest of the arguments.
If you desire to provide dynamic variables for handlers and restarts to provide an interface similar to the library-less approach, it can be accomplished relatively simply, while handing off handling of unwinding to farolero.
;; A restart
(def ^:dynamic *use-value*)
(def ^:dynamic *some-handler* (constantly nil))
(defn some-func
[]
(restart-case
(binding [*use-value* (fn [v] (use-value v))]
(do-some-stuff)
(signal ::some-condition))
(:farolero.core/use-value [v]
v)))
(defn library-entrypoint
[]
(handler-bind [::some-condition *some-handler*]
(some-func)))
;; in user code
(binding [*some-handler* (fn [condition] (*use-value* :blah))]
(library-entrypoint))
;; => :blah
This requires placing a handler-bind around all of the entrypoints of the library. If the user decides to use farolero directly instead of this approach, then having the handlers be bound to a function that returns nil will cause farolero to look further up the stack for a handler, meaning the user can bind their own handlers if desired.
An additional thing that a library developer should consider when writing code with farolero is that interactive functions, the functions used to get the arguments for an interactive restart, should be configurable by the library user so that they can provide a custom debugger that will be able to interact with your restarts, but then have a default way of fetching user input as well, as shown in the following example.
(restart-case (invoke-restart-interactively ::some-restart)
(::some-restart [a]
:interactive #(restart-case
(do (signal ::interactive-some-restart)
(list (read)))
(::some-restart [v] (list v)))
a))
This will first ask the developer if they have a way to get user input, and then
if they do not, read input from *in*
. This is the correct way to handle
interactive functions to allow user customizability, without requiring the
library user to define something special if they are willing to use the default
experience.
By convention, the restart bound inside the interactive fn should be of the same name and take the same arguments as the outer restart to allow reuse of handler functions when desired, however this convention need not always be followed.
The specific reason for this pattern, as opposed to the Common Lisp pattern of using streams for debug io, is to prevent the need for needlessly serializing and deserializing data as it is sent up and down the stack.
Condition handlers and restarts are bound only inside a particular dynamic
scope. Clojure provides facilities for deferring calculations to a later time
with things like delay
and laziness. In order for a function which produces a
lazy sequence or other deferred calculation which relies on conditions to work
properly, you must ensure that any part of the calculation which is realized
must do so with handlers bound for the conditions it might signal, and restarts
bound for what it may invoke. The easiest way to ensure this is to fully realize
any data returned from functions which use conditions. A quick and dirty way to
do this which should work on any immutable Clojure data is to call pr-str
on
the data, discarding the resulting string. This is the method used by
special, but it may fail when using
Java types or types which do not fully realize their values when printed. This
library does not attempt to force all of your functions to return fully-realized
data structures, but instead gives you the flexibility to realize things as you
like. Just be aware that if you are consistently receiving errors about
unhandled conditions when working from the repl, you may be having problems with
laziness.
Handlers and restarts are bound thread-locally, but with dynamic variable
conveyance they may carry over to other threads in some contexts. To deal with
this, farolero allows the user to specify whether a particular handler or
restart is not thread-local when calling handler-bind
or restart-bind
.
user=> (handler-bind [::foo (fn [c] (println c))]
@(future (signal ::foo)))
;; :user/foo
;; => nil
user=> (handler-bind [::foo [(fn [c] (println c)) :thread-local true]]
@(future (signal ::foo)))
;; => nil
user=> (restart-bind [::foo (fn [])]
@(future (find-restart ::foo)))
;; => #:farolero.core{:restart-name ::foo}
user=> (restart-bind [::foo [(fn []) :thread-local true]]
@(future (find-restart ::foo)))
;; => nil
If a handler or restart is labeled as thread-local, then it is simply not visible to other threads, and they will continue to search further up the stack.
user=> (handler-bind [::foo (fn [_] (println "outer"))]
(handler-bind [::foo [(fn [_] (println "inner")) :thread-local true]]
@(future (signal ::foo))))
;; outer
;; => nil
user=> (restart-bind [::foo (fn [] (println "outer"))]
(restart-bind [::foo [(fn [] (println "inner")) :thread-local true]]
@(future (invoke-restart ::foo))))
;; outer
;; => nil
In contrast to the *-bind
macros, handler-case
and restart-case
always
bind thread-local handlers and restarts, because they always unwind the stack to
a particular point.
user=> (handler-case (signal ::foo)
(::foo [c]
(println c)))
;; :user/foo
;; => nil
user=> (handler-case @(future (signal ::foo))
(::foo [c]
(println c)))
;; => nil
When using libraries which add forms of concurrency besides simple threads
(core.async, promesa, manifold, etc.), care must be taken to ensure that code
run in the context of thread-local handlers and restarts is run on the same
thread that bound them. This means that, for example, in a core.async go
block, you must not park inside the dynamic scope of thread-local restarts or
handlers if they are to be used.
In a case where you attempt to access a restart which is not bound in the
current thread, a :farolero.core/control-error
will be signaled.
The system debugger included with farolero also supports multithreaded contexts.
If the debugger is invoked from a thread while it is already active, it will be
queued for later use. If the user wishes to switch which debugger is active
while debugging, they may enter :switch-debugger
at the repl, followed by the
index of the debugger they wish to switch to. If something other than a number
is read, a control error is signaled with restarts bound to retry and to abort
and go back to the debugger you started from.
user=> (error "Error from thread 1")
;; Debugger level 1 entered on :farolero.core/simple-error
;; Error from thread 1
;; 0 [:farolero.core/throw] Throw the condition as an exception
;; user> (future (error "Error from thread 2"))
;; #object[clojure.core$future_call$reify__8477 0x646c0a67 {:status :pending, :val nil}]
;; user> :switch-debugger
;; Debuggers from other threads
;; 0 [clojure-agent-send-off-pool-0] Error from thread 2
;; Debugger to activate: 0
;; Debugger level 1 entered on :farolero.core/simple-error
;; Error from thread 2
;; 0 [:farolero.core/throw] Throw the condition as an exception
;; user> 0
;; Debugger level 1 entered on :farolero.core/simple-error
;; Error from thread 1
;; 0 [:farolero.core/throw] Throw the condition as an exception
;; user> 0
;; Execution error (ExceptionInfo) at farolero.core/fn (core.cljc:315).
;; Condition was thrown
user=>
In addition to the core functions and macros required to make conditions and restarts, farolero provides a few more control flow operators inspired by the Common Lisp spec.
The block
macro (and its paired block*
function) provides a way to perform
an early return from a named block.
(block the-block
(return-from the-block :hello)
:goodbye)
;; => :hello
Passing no second argument to return-from
results in the block
returning nil.
(block the-block
(return-from the-block)
:goodbye)
;; => nil
This return works anywhere within the dynamic scope of the block, not just within its current stack frame.
(defn some-func
[f]
(f :hello)
:goodbye)
(block the-block
(some-func #(return-from the-block %))
:goodbye)
;; => :hello
If you use a keyword instead of a symbol, then return-from
will unwind the
stack until the first block
which uses the same keyword. This is equivalent to
Common Lisp's throw
and catch
.
(defn throwing-func
[]
(return-from :the-block :goodbye))
(block :the-block
(block :the-block
(throwing-func)) ;; => :goodbye
:hello)
;; => :hello
The block*
function calls a closure in the context of such a block with the
given keyword as the block name.
(block* :the-block
#(do (return-from :the-block :hello)
:goodbye))
;; => :hello
If you want to uniquely specify a block name for use with block*
, the
make-jump-target
function is provided.
(let [the-block (make-jump-target)]
(block* the-block
#(do (return-from the-block :hello)
:goodbye)))
;; => :hello
Any extra arguments passed to block*
are passed as arguments to the closure.
(block* :the-block
#(do (return-from :the-block %)
:goodbye)
:hello)
;; => :hello
If you attempt to return-from
a block that isn't in the current thread's
dynamic scope, then a :farolero.core/control-error
is signaled.
(return-from :error nil)
;; => Entered the debugger on :farolero.core/control-error
An additional facility is tagbody
, which binds labels for its dynamic scope
which can be jumped to with go
. This is more or less an imperative letfn
,
but can be used to implement more complex control flow than the other operators
in Clojure.
(let [x (volatile! 0)]
(tagbody
(println "Entered tagbody!")
loop
(when (> @x 5)
(go exit))
(vswap! x inc)
(go loop)
exit
(println "Exiting tagbody!"))
@x)
;; => 6
The tagbody
clause always returns nil.
Just like block
and return-from
, go
may be used anywhere within the
dynamic scope of the tagbody
.
(defn call-if-greater
[v f]
(when (> v 5)
(f)))
(let [x (volatile! 0)]
(tagbody
(println "Entered tagbody!")
loop
(call-if-greater @x #(go exit))
(vswap! x inc)
(go loop)
exit
(println "Exiting tagbody!"))
@x)
;; => 6
This can be combined with block
to add a return value.
(let [x (volatile! 0)]
(block the-block
(tagbody
(println "Entered tagbody!")
loop
(when (> @x 5)
(go exit))
(vswap! x inc)
(go loop)
exit
(println "Exiting tagbody!")
(return-from the-block @x))))
;; => 6
When using restart-case
, tagbody
can be used to provide a way to retry items from the restarts.
(block exit
(tagbody
retry
(return-from exit
(restart-case (if (some-condition?)
(invoke-restart :farolero.core/continue)
:eventual-result)
(:farolero.core/continue []
(go retry))))))
The above code will either loop infinitely as some-condition?
returns true
repeatedly, or it will eventually return :eventual-result
if it ever returns
false.
Many different operators in farolero build upon the block
macro and its
associated functions. The block
macro is implemented in terms of the JVM's
exception mechanism, by throwing a value that extends java.lang.Error
. This
value specifies a particular block
that it unwinds to. The purpose of the
java.lang.Error
class is to provide a way to throw a value that is explicitly
intended not to be caught.
Unfortunately you may sometimes see code that catches java.lang.Throwable
. In
nearly all cases, this code doesn't need to and shouldn't catch this much, and
the primary reason to do it is to allow the code to catch both all
java.lang.Exception
s, and java.lang.AssertionError
.
What this means however is that in cases where code catches all Throwable
s
farolero will be unable to unwind the stack past that boundary, and if the value
is logged, it may be confusing as farolero's Signal
class does not include a
stack trace or error message.
The reality of the situation is that while farolero can do nothing about this
(except in cases where extension mechanisms are provided, as with
flow), many pieces of code that catch
Throwable
are frameworks of various sorts, and it's unlikely to desire
unwinding past them, so this rarely is an issue, but it is one that you should
keep in mind when using farolero.
Some other error handling libraries will try to interact with exceptions by
catching Throwable
, which will interfere with the farolero unwind mechanism.
Thankfully, some of those libraries also provide extension mechanisms to specify
behavior for particular exceptions, which gives farolero a way to keep the
unwind mechanism functional. In cases like this, farolero adds an extension
namespace.
When working with JVM Clojure, this will operate transparently to the user, as the libraries will be detected at runtime and extensions loaded. Unfortunately, ClojureScript doesn't provide a mechanism for checking for dependencies at runtime, and this means that you will have to require the extension namespace yourself to activate the integration.
The namespace names for extensions are of the form
farolero.extensions.lib-name
, like farolero.extensions.flow
for integration
with flow.
The following libraries currently have extensions:
You may run into one of the issues below. I am aware of them and have plans to fix them. If you know how to fix them or have the time, pull requests are always welcome!
Copyright © 2021 Joshua Suskalo
Distributed under the Eclipse Public License version 1.0.
Can you improve this documentation?Edit on GitHub
cljdoc is a website building & hosting documentation for Clojure/Script libraries
× close