clojure.java.jdbc
This page attempts to list all of the differences between clojure.java.jdbc and next.jdbc
. Some of them are large and obvious, some of them are small and subtle -- all of them are deliberate design choices.
clojure.java.jdbc
focuses heavily on a db-spec
hash map to describe the various ways of interacting with the database and grew from very imperative origins that expose a lot of the JDBC API (multiple type of SQL execution, some operations returned hash maps, others update counts as integers, etc).
next.jdbc
focuses on using protocols and native Java JDBC types where possible (for performance and simplicity) and strives to present a more modern Clojure API with namespace-qualified keywords in hash maps, reducible SQL operations as part of the primary API, and a streamlined set of SQL execution primitives. Execution always returns a hash map (for one result) or a vector of hash maps (for multiple results) -- even update counts are returned as if they were result sets.
clojure.java.jdbc
returned result sets (and generated keys) as hash maps with simple, lower-case keys by default. next.jdbc
returns result sets (and generated keys) as hash maps with qualified, as-is keys by default: each key is qualified by the name of table from which it is drawn, if known. The as-is default is chosen to a) improve performance and b) not mess with the data. Using a :gen-fn
option of next.jdbc.result-set/as-unqualified-maps
will produce simple, as-is keys. Using a :gen-fn
option of next.jdbc.result-set/as-unqualified-lower-maps
will produce simple, lower-case keys -- the most compatible with clojure.java.jdbc
's default behavior.
If you used :as-arrays? true
, you will need to use a :gen-fn
option of next.jdbc.result-set/as-arrays
(or the unqualified or lower variant, as appropriate).
next.jdbc
has a deliberately narrow primary API that has (almost) no direct overlap with clojure.java.jdbc
:
get-datasource
-- has no equivalent in clojure.java.jdbc
but is intended to emphasize javax.sql.DataSource
as a starting point,get-connection
-- overlaps with clojure.java.jdbc
(and returns a java.sql.Connection
) but accepts only a subset of the options (:dbtype
/:dbname
hash map, String
JDBC URI); clojure.java.jdbc/get-connection
accepts {:datasource ds}
whereas next.jdbc/get-connection
accepts the javax.sql.DataSource
object directly,prepare
-- somewhat similar to clojure.java.jdbc/prepare-statement
but it accepts a vector of SQL and parameters (compared to just a raw SQL string),reducible!
-- somewhat similar to clojure.java.jdbc/reducible-query
but accepts arbitrary SQL statements for execution,execute!
-- has no direct equivalent in clojure.java.jdbc
(but it can replace most uses of both query
and db-do-commands
),execute-one!
-- has no equivalent in clojure.java.jdbc
(but it can replace most uses of query
that currently use :result-set-fn first
),transact
-- similar to clojure.java.jdbc/db-transaction*
,with-transaction
-- similar to clojure.java.jdbc/with-db-transaction
.If you were using a bare db-spec
hash map with :dbtype
/:dbname
, or a JDBC URI string everywhere, that should mostly work with next.jdbc
since most functions accept a "connectable", but it would be better to create a datasource first, and then pass that around.
If you were already creating db-spec
as a pooled connection datasource -- a {:datasource ds}
hashmap -- then passing (:datasource db-spec)
to the next.jdbc
functions is the simplest migration path.
If you were using other forms of the db-spec
hash map, you'll need to adjust to one of the three modes above, since those are the only ones supported in next.jdbc
.
The next.jdbc.sql
namespace contains several functions with similarities to clojure.java.jdbc
's core API:
insert!
-- similar to clojure.java.jdbc/insert!
but only supports inserting a single map,insert-multi!
-- similar to clojure.java.jdbc/insert-multi!
but only supports inserting columns and a vector of row values,query
-- similar to clojure.java.jdbc/query
,find-by-keys
-- similar to clojure.java.jdbc/find-by-keys
but also accepts a partial where clause (vector),get-by-id
-- similar to clojure.java.jdbc/get-by-id
,update!
-- similar to clojure.java.jdbc/update!
but also accepts a hash map of column name/value pairs,delete!
-- similar to clojure.java.jdbc/delete!
but also accepts a hash map of column name/value pairs.If you are using :identifiers
and/or :entities
, you will need to change to appropriate :gen-fn
and/or :table-fn
/:column-fn
options. For the latter, instead of the quoted
function, there is next.jdbc.quoted
which contains functions for the common quoting strategies.
If you are using :result-set-fn
and/or :row-fn
, you will need to change to explicit calls (to the result set function, or to map
the row function), or to use the reducible!
approach with reduce
or various transducing functions. Note: this means that result sets are never exposed lazily in next.jdbc
-- in clojure.java.jdbc
you had to be careful that your :result-set-fn
was eager, but in next.jdbc
you either reduce the result set eagerly (via reducible!
) or you get a fully-realized result set data structure back (from execute!
and execute-one!
). As with clojure.java.jdbc
however, you can still stream result sets from the database and process them via reduction (was reducible-query
, now reducible!
). Remember that you can terminate a reduction early by using the reduced
function to wrap the final value you produce.
These are mostly drawn from Issue #5 although most of the bullets in that issue are described in more detail above.
?
-- to reflect the latest best practice on predicates vs. attributes,with-db-connection
has been replaced by just with-open
containing a call to get-connection
,with-transaction
can take a :rollback-only
option, but there is no way to change a transaction to rollback dynamically; throw an exception instead (all transactions roll back on an exception)SettableParameter
and ReadableColumn
protocols.Can you improve this documentation?Edit on GitHub
cljdoc is a website building & hosting documentation for Clojure/Script libraries
× close