clojure.java.jdbc
This page attempts to list all of the differences between clojure.java.jdbc and next.jdbc
. Some of them are large and obvious, some of them are small and subtle -- all of them are deliberate design choices.
clojure.java.jdbc
focuses heavily on a db-spec
hash map to describe the various ways of interacting with the database and grew from very imperative origins that expose a lot of the JDBC API (multiple types of SQL execution, some operations returned hash maps, others update counts as integers, etc).
next.jdbc
focuses on using protocols and native Java JDBC types where possible (for performance and simplicity) and strives to present a more modern Clojure API with namespace-qualified keywords in hash maps, reducible SQL operations as part of the primary API, and a streamlined set of SQL execution primitives. Execution always returns a hash map (for one result) or a vector of hash maps (for multiple results) -- even update counts are returned as if they were result sets.
clojure.java.jdbc
returned result sets (and generated keys) as hash maps with simple, lower-case keys by default. next.jdbc
returns result sets (and generated keys) as hash maps with qualified, as-is keys by default: each key is qualified by the name of table from which it is drawn, if known. The as-is default is chosen to a) improve performance and b) not mess with the data. Using a :builder-fn
option of next.jdbc.result-set/as-unqualified-maps
will produce simple, as-is keys. Using a :builder-fn
option of next.jdbc.result-set/as-unqualified-lower-maps
will produce simple, lower-case keys -- the most compatible with clojure.java.jdbc
's default behavior.
Note:
clojure.java.jdbc
would make column names unique by appending numeric suffixes, for example in aJOIN
that produced columnsid
from multiple tables.next.jdbc
does not do this: if you use qualified column names -- the default -- then you would get:sometable/id
and:othertable/id
, but with unqualified column names you would just get one:id
in each row. It was always poor practice to rely onclojure.java.jdbc
's renaming behavior and it added quite an overhead to result set building, which is whynext.jdbc
does not support it -- use explicit column aliasing in your SQL instead if you want unqualified column names!
If you used :as-arrays? true
, you will most likely want to use a :builder-fn
option of next.jdbc.result-set/as-unqualified-lower-arrays
.
Note: When
next.jdbc
cannot obtain aResultSet
object and returns{:next.jdbc/count N}
instead, these builder functions are not applied -- the:builder-fn
option is not used in that situation.
Because clojure.java.jdbc
focuses on a hash map for the db-spec
that is passed around, it can hold options that act as defaults for all operations on it. In addition, all operations in clojure.java.jdbc
can accept a hash map of options and can pass those options down the call chain. In next.jdbc
, get-datasource
, get-connection
, and prepare
all produce Java objects that cannot have any extra options attached. On one hand, that means that it is harder to provide "default options", and on the other hand it means you need to be a bit more careful to ensure that you pass the appropriate options to the appropriate function, since they cannot be passed through the call chain via the db-spec
. That's where next.jdbc/with-options
can come in handy to wrap a connectable (generally a datasource or a connection) but be careful where you are managing connections and/or transactions directly, as mentioned in the Getting Started guide.
In All The Options, the appropriate options are shown for each function, as well as which options will get passed down the call chain, e.g., if a function can open a connection, it will accept options for get-connection
; if a function can build a result set, it will accept :builder-fn
. However, get-datasource
, get-connection
, and prepare
cannot propagate options any further because they produce Java objects as their results -- in particular, prepare
can't accept :builder-fn
because it doesn't build result sets: only plan
, execute-one!
, and execute!
can use :builder-fn
.
In particular, this means that you can't globally override the default options (as you could with clojure.java.jdbc
by adding your preferred defaults to the db-spec itself). If the default options do not suit your usage and you really don't want to override them in every call, it is recommended that you try to use next.jdbc/with-options
first, and if that still doesn't satisfy you, write a wrapper namespace that implements the subset of the dozen API functions (from next.jdbc
and next.jdbc.sql
) that you want to use, overriding their opts
argument with your defaults.
next.jdbc
has a deliberately narrow primary API that has (almost) no direct overlap with clojure.java.jdbc
:
get-datasource
-- has no equivalent in clojure.java.jdbc
but is intended to emphasize javax.sql.DataSource
as a starting point,get-connection
-- overlaps with clojure.java.jdbc
(and returns a java.sql.Connection
) but accepts only a subset of the options (:dbtype
/:dbname
hash map, String
JDBC URL); clojure.java.jdbc/get-connection
accepts {:datasource ds}
whereas next.jdbc/get-connection
accepts the javax.sql.DataSource
object directly,prepare
-- somewhat similar to clojure.java.jdbc/prepare-statement
but it accepts a vector of SQL and parameters (compared to just a raw SQL string),plan
-- somewhat similar to clojure.java.jdbc/reducible-query
but accepts arbitrary SQL statements for execution,execute!
-- has no direct equivalent in clojure.java.jdbc
(but it can replace most uses of both query
and db-do-commands
),execute-one!
-- has no equivalent in clojure.java.jdbc
(but it can replace most uses of query
that currently use :result-set-fn first
),transact
-- similar to clojure.java.jdbc/db-transaction*
,with-transaction
-- similar to clojure.java.jdbc/with-db-transaction
,with-options
-- provides a way to specify "default options" over a group of operations, by wrapping the connectable (datasource or connection).If you were using a bare db-spec
hash map with :dbtype
/:dbname
, or a JDBC URL string everywhere, that should mostly work with next.jdbc
since most functions accept a "connectable", but it would be better to create a datasource first, and then pass that around. Note that clojure.java.jdbc
allowed the jdbc:
prefix in a JDBC URL to be omitted but next.jdbc
requires that prefix!
If you were already creating db-spec
as a pooled connection datasource -- a {:datasource ds}
hashmap -- then passing (:datasource db-spec)
to the next.jdbc
functions is the simplest migration path. If you are migrating piecemeal and want to support both clojure.java.jdbc
and next.jdbc
at the same time in your code, you should consider using a datasource as the common way to work with both libraries. You can using next.jdbc
's get-datasource
or the ->pool
function (in next.jdbc.connection
) to create the a javax.sql.DataSource
and then build a db-spec
hash map with it ({:datasource ds}
) and pass that around your program. clojure.java.jdbc
calls can use that as-is, next.jdbc
calls can use (:datasource db-spec)
, so you don't have to adjust any of your call chains (assuming you're passing db-spec
around) and you can migrate one function at a time.
If you were using other forms of the db-spec
hash map, you'll need to adjust to one of the three modes above, since those are the only ones supported in next.jdbc
.
The next.jdbc.sql
namespace contains several functions with similarities to clojure.java.jdbc
's core API:
insert!
-- similar to clojure.java.jdbc/insert!
but only supports inserting a single map,insert-multi!
-- similar to clojure.java.jdbc/insert-multi!
but only supports inserting columns and a vector of row values,query
-- similar to clojure.java.jdbc/query
,find-by-keys
-- similar to clojure.java.jdbc/find-by-keys
but will also accept a partial where clause (vector) instead of a hash map of column name/value pairs,get-by-id
-- similar to clojure.java.jdbc/get-by-id
,update!
-- similar to clojure.java.jdbc/update!
but will also accept a hash map of column name/value pairs instead of a partial where clause (vector),delete!
-- similar to clojure.java.jdbc/delete!
but will also accept a hash map of column name/value pairs instead of a partial where clause (vector).If you were using db-do-commands
in clojure.java.jdbc
to execute DDL, the following is the equivalent in next.jdbc
:
(defn do-commands [connectable commands]
(if (instance? java.sql.Connection connectable)
(with-open [stmt (next.jdbc.prepare/statement connectable)]
(run! #(.addBatch stmt %) commands)
(into [] (.executeBatch stmt)))
(with-open [conn (next.jdbc/get-connection connectable)]
(do-commands conn commands))))
:identifiers
and :qualifier
If you are using :identifiers
, you will need to change to the appropriate :builder-fn
option with one of next.jdbc.result-set
's as-*
functions.
clojure.java.jdbc
's default is the equivalent of as-unqualified-lower-maps
(with the caveat that conflicting column names are not made unique -- see the note above in Rows and Result Sets). If you specified :identifiers identity
, you can use as-unqualified-maps
. If you provided your own string transformation function, you probably want as-unqualified-modified-maps
and also pass your transformation function as the :label-fn
option.
If you used :qualifier
, you can get the same effect with as-modified-maps
by passing :qualifier-fn (constantly "my_qualifier")
(and the appropriate :label-fn
-- either identity
or clojure.string/lowercase
).
:entities
If you are using :entities
, you will need to change to the appropriate :table-fn
/:column-fn
options. Table naming and column naming can be controlled separately in next.jdbc
. Instead of the quoted
function, there is the next.jdbc.quoted
namespace which contains functions for the common quoting strategies.
:result-set-fn
and :row-fn
If you are using :result-set-fn
and/or :row-fn
, you will need to change to explicit calls (to the result set function, or to map
the row function), or to use the plan
approach with reduce
or various transducing functions.
Note: this means that result sets are never exposed lazily in
next.jdbc
-- inclojure.java.jdbc
you had to be careful that your:result-set-fn
was eager, but innext.jdbc
you either reduce the result set eagerly (viaplan
) or you get a fully-realized result set data structure back (fromexecute!
andexecute-one!
). As withclojure.java.jdbc
however, you can still stream result sets from the database and process them via reduction (wasreducible-query
, nowplan
). Remember that you can terminate a reduction early by using thereduced
function to wrap the final value you produce.
There are no metadata-specific functions in next.jdbc
but those in clojure.java.jdbc
are only a very thin layer over the raw Java calls. Here's how metadata can be handled in next.jdbc
:
(with-open [con (p/get-connection ds opts)]
(-> (.getMetaData con) ; produces java.sql.DatabaseMetaData
(.getTables nil nil nil (into-array ["TABLE" "VIEW"]))
(rs/datafiable-result-set ds opts)))
Several methods on DatabaseMetaData
return a ResultSet
object. All of those can be handled similarly.
These are mostly drawn from Issue #5 although most of the bullets in that issue are described in more detail above.
?
-- for consistency (in clojure.java.jdbc
, some flag options ended in ?
and some did not; also some options that ended in ?
accepted non-Boolean
values, e.g., :as-arrays?
and :explain?
),with-db-connection
has been replaced by just with-open
containing a call to get-connection
,with-transaction
can take a :rollback-only
option, but there is no built-in way to change a transaction to rollback dynamically; either throw an exception (all transactions roll back on an exception) or call .rollback
directly on the java.sql.Connection
object (see Manual Rollback Inside a Transactions and the following section about save points),SettableParameter
and ReadableColumn
protocols.Can you improve this documentation? These fine people already did:
Sean Corfield & Lauri OherdEdit on GitHub
cljdoc is a website building & hosting documentation for Clojure/Script libraries
× close